We Eat Social Media for Breakfast

     Diction, syntax, tone, and rhetorical strategies can be used in a variety of ways to develop and support an argument. The author's main goal is to help the readers better understand what they are talking about and let them know how they feel about a certain situation. The writing has to be engaging so that the readers keep reading which is why authors use strategies. If you think about it, readers will get bored reading if they don't understand what is being said and what is trying to be proven. In the essay the author writes in an informal way, he has a friendly and serious tone at certain times, and uses rhetorical strategies to support his argument and help the readers understand. 

     The author's diction isn't very sophisticated and he chooses words that most people will understand with ease. His diction supports his main argument in a way which the readers will better understand what is trying to be said. When reading the essay it is clear what the author is trying to say and what he is trying to convey. You can put yourself in his situation. You can tell the author's writing is informal when he says," Thanks for reading". Clearly this is informal and it makes it seem like he is writing to a friend or family. The essay is supposed to make you keep reading to find out what his argument is. 

     Throughout the essay the author's tone changes depending on the situation. There are times when he is acting friendly towards something and other times when he is serious about something. When he says,"I'm a wannabe Millennial" it is meant to be funny and friendly. He isn't really trying to be a Millennial it just comes off that way. Readers better understand what he is feeling when he says this and it supports his main argument about how technology, internet, and the social media have changed people's lives. There are other times when he is serious such as when he says,"I missed someone. I wish I could've shared the meal with her.". This should be taken as something serious and it lets the readers know that the author is upset about not being able to share his meal with someone he loves." Overall the authors tone lets the readers know how he feels about certain things that happened to him.

     The rhetorical strategies used in the essay are great at persuading the readers towards seeing things in a different way. He explains about how the meaning of pictures have changed over time and how social media is like a tool. After reading this essay the readers begin to think differently about technology and the internet. He talks about how technology brings people together like never before and it keeps them connected. His use of syntax furthermore supports his argument in a way which makes the readers think differently about technology. At one point in the essay the author talks about the Greek term Techne which means,"systematic treatment of an art, craft, or technique. In a way he wants to let readers know that technology and the internet represent a belief system.

     Overall the author's use of diction, syntax, tone, and rhetorical devices help the reader understand what is trying to be said. Diction is somewhat informal so that people feel like the author is talking to them, rhetorical strategies persuade the reader to think differently and the tone changes throughout the essay to show how the author feels about something. The author's main goal was to tell people how he felt about the internet and social media being used as tools and how they are a belief system. He tried to open up people'e eyes to how technology is evolving and changing our way of life. 

Essay

Question: Read the paragraph for E.M Forster's 1936 essay, "My Wood". Define Foster's attitude toward the experience of owning property and analyze that attitude; consider Foster's word choice, manipulation of sentences, and use of biblical allusions.

Prewrite:
- E.M Forster has property and wants to know its effects on him.
- He believes that owning property changes someone's behavior.
- It becomes harder to move when you have such a big place with many items.
- You have to dust, which means you need a duster, which leads to having servants, which need        insurance.
- The "Wood" represents his land.
- Owning property is not as good as it seems.
- He feels like he always has to do something to make his property better.
- He uses biblical allusions to convey a feeling and help the readers understand.
- His word choice is advanced and his readers are most likely well educated people who will truly undersand his metaphors and biblical allusions.
- He says property creates men of weight, which could mean that men get more selfish when they acquire more and more things.

Essay:

     E.M Forster wrote the essay, "My Wood" after his recent purchase of a house and land. He believed that owning more property and having more things would bring joy to his life. However after his experience with all this new property, his perception of owning property quickly changed. Throughout his essay he repeats, "My wood makes me feel heavy", a few times to let the readers know that he is not happy with having so much property and that it was dragging him down. Overall, Forster has a negative attitude towards owning property and conveys this feeling through the manipulation of words, word choice, and use of biblical allusions.

     E.M Forster's goal was to find out what owning property does to someone and its psychological effects on people. He talks about how it becomes harder to move when you have property because you have so many things to take with you. Maintenance becomes more difficult since there are more things you need to clean. Clearly, these things would change somebody's behavior and view on owning property. Increasing maintenance could lead to hiring servants which could lead to the person becoming lazy and expecting others to do their work all the time. In Forster's experience he was never satisfied with his property. Even though he owned it there were public paths that went through his land. He felt like the land wasn't fully his. You can tell Forster has changed because now he wants the property all to himself. He feels like he deserves to have it all to himself.

     Forster's choice of words is advanced and he uses objects to symbolize other things, such as his land which he refers to as his "wood". He says his wood makes him feel heavy. This could mean many things such as not being able to move around easily with all his stuff, becoming a selfish person, or even feeling like owning all this property is completely changing him. He believes that as he acquires more things he becomes heavier and heavier. He is becoming a man of weight. Instead of writing that he is a man who is buying more and more things, he writes that he is becoming a man of weight. He uses these words to symbolize that all his property makes him heavier.

      Forster's intended audience is for more mature people who will understand his vocabulary and use of biblical allusions. In one part of his essay when he talks about wanting more and more land he says, "Happier Alexander" which he could be referring to Alexander the Great who conquered a lot of land when he was a king. He could also be implying that people who own a lot of land feel like they are kings and that they should be respected. This could lead to people becoming arrogant and an increase in ego. Clearly these allusions help the readers understand in a deeper meaning what Forster is trying to say. Forster's allusions support his opinion on owning property.

     Forster's essay is informative and his purpose is to let people know that they should really think about what they're going to buy. He talks about his experience and how he felt himself changing. His manipulation of sentences help the reader get a better understanding of what he is trying to say. He mentions a bird that is on his property yet it is not his. He uses this to prove that he is not satisfied with his property and that it is not enough for him. Overall, Forster has a negative attitude towards owning land and doesn't want his readers to become the  men of weight which he describes in his essay. He supports his argument with allusions and personal experience.

   

Fahrenheit 451 Essay

Option 1

     Ray Bradbury's tone towards Clarisse is somewhat opposite to his tone towards Beatty, he wants to make Clarisse seem more affectionate and like someone who steered Montag's life into a better direction while Beatty wanted to stop Montag from heading in the wrong direction by reading books. Bradbury makes Beatty seem like someone who wanted to prevent Montag from changing. In this novel, conformity is one of the main issues in society. Everyone does the same things and they don't really pay attention or question why they are doing what they are doing. They sort of just follow the crowd and go on with their lives.

     Bradbury makes Clarisse seem like the outcast, however she impacts Montag's life greatly and shows him that not everything is as it seems. Clarisse's main role was to change Montag's perception of society and show him how much the world has changed. When Montag meets Clarisse, he realizes that she is not like everyone else and that she thinks for herself. Bradbury's tone is supportive and shows us that Montag's life may change for the better because of Clarisse. As Montag's life goes on he realizes that he has not seen Clarisse in a while. He asks Mildred if she has seen Clarisse recently and she says that Clarisse got ran over. Montag gets sad and wonders why things happen. Clarisse's death makes him want to read books in order to find the answers to his questions.

     On the other hand, Bradbury's tone towards Beatty shows us that Beatty isn't someone great and that he was doing the opposite of what Clarisse had done to Montag. Clarisse had changed Montag's perception however Beatty was trying to show Montag that it is not worth risking his life just to read books and think differently. During this time, it is considered illegal to read books. When people were caught with books, their books were burned and the person was arrested. Although it seems like Beatty was trying to help Montag not get arrested, he wasn't doing him a favor either by preventing him from thinking for himself. However, it's a bit weird that Beatty knows so much about books, maybe he used to read them secretly in the past and doesn't want Montag to waste his time. Clearly Bradbury wants the readers to know that Beatty is both good and bad towards Montag, depending on how you view the situation.

     Overall, it can be argued that Bradbury's tone towards Clarisse is much more supportive and helpful than his tone towards Beatty, the person who tried to stop Montag from thinking for himself and burned his books. His use of diction and syntax allows the readers to interpret what he writes in certain ways. He makes Clarisse seem like a sweet young girl who lit a spark in Montag's mind while he makes Beatty look like the mean antagonist.